Next: Numerical Implementation
Up: Determining Pair Interactions from
Previous: Introduction
We consider a two-dimensional system of N particles
in a quenched random
pinscape consisting of discrete pinning sites positioned at random.
The particles, which can be interpreted as
stiff magnetic flux lines, have positions that are
specified by (two-dimensional) vectors
.
As a convention, particle and pinning site locations
are subscripted with Latin and Greek indices, respectively.
The force on the ith flux line at position
is given by
 |
(3) |
Here the first and second sum are the contributions to the
total force on a given particle due to its
interactions with the other particles and with the pinning sites;
U(r) is the interparticle interaction, whereas
is the particle-
pin interaction.
For stiff magnetic flux lines, the interparticle potential U(r)
(per unit length) is given in the
low-density limit by the asymptotic form Eq. (2).
We assume that the pinning potential due to a single pin is
attractive and short ranged,
 |
(4) |
where
is the pin's strength,
and rp its range.
The locations of the pinning sites
are assumed to be distributed
at random. We seek stable and static flux line configurations
given by solutions to
 |
(5) |
with the additional stability constraint that the matrix
be positive-definite.
If
is such a
configuration, the pair correlation function
g*(r) for this configuration is given by
![\begin{displaymath}
g^*(r) = \frac{\langle \int \rho^* ({\bf x}-{\bf r})
\rho^...
...f x} \rangle_\theta}
{[\int \rho^* ({\bf x}) \, d{\bf x}]^2},
\end{displaymath}](img25.gif) |
(6) |
with
 |
(7) |
and
denoting an average over angles.
The pair correlation function g(r) is obtained by averaging
Eq. (6) over independent configurations.
If the analogy to liquid structure theory adequately describes the
emergence of structure in this quenched random system, then
Eqs. (1) and (2) imply that (to lowest order)
 |
(8) |
Thus liquid theory predicts that
a plot of the corresponding quantity versus r should yield a linear
relation with slope
,
as observed experimentally
in the inset to Fig. 1.
Our numerical work involves
solving Eq. (5)
for static configurations and thereby obtaining the configuration-averaged
pair correlation function. Details of the implementation
and presentation of our numerical results are given in the following
two sections.
Next: Numerical Implementation
Up: Determining Pair Interactions from
Previous: Introduction
David G. Grier
1998-11-19